This is the place to post general questions and comments about all areas of orthodontic treatment. Before you post a question, use the forum's SEARCH tool to see if your question has already been answered!
New Members: YOU MUST MAKE A POST WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REGISTERING OR YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE DELETED. In other words, don't sign up unless you plan to actively participate in the message board immediately. This is necessary to keep out spammers and lurkers with bad intentions. Of course, you can read most forums on the board without registering.
DO NOT POST FULL-FACE PHOTOS or personal contact information on this website. We have had problems with people re-posting members' photos on fetish websites. Please only post photos of your teeth, not your whole face. Keep your email and your personal information private. Thank you.
SecondTimer, I read your story on the other thread. We really are in similar positions. And you know, I have had these 12 brackets on for a few days and I just can't see how these will give the ortho the leverage to straighten the front teeth. Part of my problem is that on the bottom, one of my cuspids is sort of twisted. That is, it's facing forward instead of facing out as part of a curve. That cuspid is one of the "anchor" teeth as it is the last tooth on one side to have a bracket. So from what I see, that tooth will never get turned the way these brackets are. I suppose I could be wrong, but I am seriously questioning how good a correction I can get with only 12 brackets. I will ask the ortho at my next appt in a few weeks.
I would have gone for all the brackets and bands like you did. At this point, what would it matter? I have brackets on every single visible tooth right now anyway. And why would be going through this a second time if not to achieve a nearly perfect result?
If the cuspid is rotated, then I think it would be very difficult to rotate it without having at least the tooth behind it bracketed, but I really don't know for sure. You should definately ask your ortho.
My ortho just felt that it would be easier for him to expand the upper arch a little, giving him more room to straighten the lower teeth. The original plan was to flare the top teeth forward a little and shave the lower teeth with 12 brackets (6U/6L). The final plan was to broaden the upper arch, creating enough room to straighten the lower arch without shaving the teeth. This required 24 brackets (12U/12L)
Once I got over the initial shock of 'this is more than I signed on for', I have been pleased. Once the front teeth are bracketed, it doesn't make much difference what goes on behind. Plus I like this approach because the lower teeth don't have to be shaved.
Hi SecondTimer, when your doctor originally suggested shaving the bottom teeth, so you mean shaving the sides of the teeth or the tops? I like the sound of your new treatment plan.
I will be asking my ortho about the cuspids for sure. One is in the correct position and one is only very slightly rotated. I'll bet he's thinking that it's fine the way it is, but if he can get a better correction with all the teeth bracketed I will probably go that way.
Thanks for sharing your experience. It's very helpful to compare.
The initial plan was to shave the sides of the lower teeth so the arch could be rounded within the space afforded by the upper arch. But after reviewing the models and x-rays, the ortho decided it'd be better to 'broaden' the upper arch slightly. I only had something like 3mm of crowding in the upper arch (which surprised me because I thought there was none) and 4mm of crowding in the lower arch so we're not talking about major crowding. Extracting a lower incisor was also discussed as a possibility if things didn't work out as planned. On my third adjustment, I was assured this would not be necessary as my teeth are moving as planned. That made me feel better, because I'm not sure I would have actually gone through with that!
And why would be going through this a second time if not to achieve a nearly perfect result? 