Page 1 of 1

Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:01 pm
by lillyr1991
I never thought I needed a cheek augmentation but, I went to Dr. Arnett and he said one cheek bone is bigger than the other, so he wants to do a cheek augmentation on just my right cheek.

I'm having both jaws moved forward btw.
Also, are there any risks to getting a cheek augmentation, he said he would use bone grafts?

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:05 pm
by asmileconnectsus
I had cheek augmentations done with my double jaw surgery I had in Nov '09 with Gunson/Arnett. No problems with them at all. They probably only want to do one side because of the asymmetry...which, if not fixed, will likely be more prominent post double surgery.

Best of luck!

Mary

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:33 am
by WiredRunner
I also had cheek augmentations done and I'm really happy with the result.

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 pm
by shanalouis
does cheek implants cause an infection and wont they move in the face

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:46 pm
by asmileconnectsus
From what I understand, the putty they use (at least in my case with Gunson) adheres to your bone and actually heals to the existing bone. So no, they do not move or float around. I have also not heard of infection from cheek implants. When you're dealing with such a major surgery, there are many many ways you can get an infection easier than with the implants. I wouldn't list it as a major concern.

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:07 pm
by shanalouis
oh. well i just asked because i read online that they can cause an infection or migrate sometimes....

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:29 pm
by RMF7825
I have read that chin implants can move, but have not come across same type of information about cheeck implants. I believe they use different materials. Might be good question to ask.

Re: Cheek augmentation bad idea?

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:33 pm
by qwertz1
if they use bone grafting there is no implant, right?
there is some risk of resorption then I guess