Page 1 of 1

Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:24 am
by Eurodude
Why do some people with narrow misaligned jaws decide to have them surgically expanded instead of going the orthodontic route? Is it because there is a certain degree of deformation beyond which orthodontics isn't effective?
Thanks in advance for any feedback

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:25 pm
by Van'braces
Hi,
At a certain age (can be assessed by x-ray), the bones of the palate fuse together. A surgical procedure can be performed to open up the fuse line again for expansion of a narrow palate. There are loads of journal articles on the SARPE procedure versus non surgical expansion, arguing whether non surgical expansion does expand the palate or work by tipping the teeth outwards only. Personally I went for surgery, and I'm so glad I did. If you are unsure, I'd sugest asking your surgeon and ortho' many questions on the matter to come to your own conclusion. I have my own opinion on the subject but I am not qualified to argue one way or the other!
Good Luck with your decision and treatment!

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 2:51 am
by coffeecupcakes
If you're talking about palatal expanders, they only work on young people (under 15 is most effective). Some adults can have orthodontic expansion, but will require surgery to 'split' the jaw bone anyway in order for it to work.

In my opinion the surgery-assisted expansion sounds quite painful / takes longer, so you might as well go for surgical expansion unless your orthodontist says otherwise...

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:09 am
by Eurodude
Its a contentious issue. Some medical sources say the cranial bones are fused and no movement is possible. Others say the bones are in constant movement and can be developed. I am wearing an upper ALF appliance and it has widened my maxilla noticeably without tipping the teeth but it took a year and I still need more expansion so I was thinking the surgery would have been a quicker fix. Seems like there is more than one way to get from A to B.

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:47 am
by Minerva
Eurodude,

Do you mind telling your age?

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:19 am
by Eurodude
50 now, started expansion at 49

Re: Surgical versus Orthodontic Expansion?

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:34 pm
by Minerva
Thank you, Eurodude.
Eurodude wrote:Its a contentious issue. Some medical sources say the cranial bones are fused and no movement is possible. Others say the bones are in constant movement and can be developed.
That must be the reason.

Congratulations on your expansion. Have you gone through much pain?