Functionally good but aesthetically bad?
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:17 pm
Could a result be good functionally, bad aesthetically and possible to change aesthetically without losing the good functionality? I’ll give you an example:
I had jaw surgery and I don’t like how they placed the jaws. There’s no cant but I feel like both jaws are rotated too much to the left. Both dental midlines are off to the left and the arches looks strangely rotated horizontally. But I haven’t had any problems with the bite. I guess that my jaws are in a functionally good position but (to me) in a aesthetically bad position.
I guess rotating the lower jaw to the right to make it better aesthetically would affect the functionality? Wouldn’t rotating the lower jaw change the position of the joint and all that?
I had jaw surgery and I don’t like how they placed the jaws. There’s no cant but I feel like both jaws are rotated too much to the left. Both dental midlines are off to the left and the arches looks strangely rotated horizontally. But I haven’t had any problems with the bite. I guess that my jaws are in a functionally good position but (to me) in a aesthetically bad position.
I guess rotating the lower jaw to the right to make it better aesthetically would affect the functionality? Wouldn’t rotating the lower jaw change the position of the joint and all that?