Ok, I've just returned from a weekend at a huge public event – a tallships festival in Belfast. So given my new hobby of teeth spotting I had ample opportunity to look at the various bites people seem to have. And again, as I'd been saying in previous posts, the vast majority of people appeared to have had enough of an overjet when speaking to make me think they could only have likewise even if their teeth were clenched. Almost everyone's lower incisors appeared to be set back behind their upper incisors in such a way that they could only have had an overjet.
Interestingly, as well as a very very small number of people with underbites, there was also a category of people whose lower incisors seemed to be just behind and only just overlapped by the upper front teeth – the supposed perfect anterior occlusion, if you like. However, of all the teeth I noticed this group too were in a minority and more importantly they just didn't look good. All seemed to have somewhat excessive chins.
So now I'm really not sure. People just do seem to look as if they mostly have mild overjets. More's the point, if it is the case, as it's been argued here, that the normal bite involves anterior teeth touching when they overlap, why then is there a certain category of people whose lower jaw looks too forward despite having seemingly straight upper incisors that sit in front of their lowers? They seem to have this 'perfect' bite and yet don't look good. The majority who aren't as 'chinny' as the people in this group can only have more of an overjet between the two sets of anterior teeth.
Furthermore, I've come across a website with pics of people that had huge overjets and have had these 'corrected' without surgery to still excessive but not as great overjets. Most of these people – who might like Mimmy have went down from 13mm to 8mm – actually look to now have very good facial profiles; yet they're miles from this 'accepted' perfect bite. So much so that if you were to surgically make up the still considerable shortfall in the lower jaw they would probably look awful. But given they've got so close to a good facial appearance with merely a reduction to a less excessive, but still class II occlusion, leads me back to my suspicion that the normal bite involves a mild overjet.
Indeed, I've read the posts of someone who I think is an orthodontist on this board that confirm that it's not good practice to aim for zero mms of overjet; everyone should have a few mms for functional reasons.
Oh, and don't incisors and scissors just share the same latin root, going back to cut, and it's not that the former takes its meaning from the latter in referring to two edges overlapping and cutting. I mean chisel also apparently goes back to the latin for 'cut' and yet there's only one sharp edge involved there.
Finally, sorry about the long and what I hope doesn't come across as too argumentative post. It's just that I really am confused by this feature of the teeth and still don't know what to think!
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)