X-ray Radiation dangers

This forum is for discussions relating to oral surgery for orthodontics.

Moderator: bbsadmin

Post Reply
Message
Author
Noam
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:51 pm

X-ray Radiation dangers

#1 Post by Noam »

I've started orthodontic treatment 13 months ago. Since then, I had 2 lateral cephalometric x-rays (actually 3, since one didn't came out right and had to do it again) and one panormaic x-ray.

I suppose to have surgery on June, and I believe that I'll have to go through at least 1 more lateral cephalometric x-ray near surgery date, and after surgery who knows how many...

I wonder how much radiation I'm getting here, and how dangerous it is ?

chicago29
Posts: 734
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Chicago Suburbs, IL

#2 Post by chicago29 »

I think about this as well, and I'm conscious to ask that all x-rays are medically necessary. That being said, there's no way around it though as several x-rays need to be taken immediately prior to surgery, and you'll have a few of them afterwards. It just goes with the territory.

The good news is that ceph and panoramic xrays are pretty low on the radiation scale. They are nothing like a CT Scan or anything like that. In fact, I recall reading that a modern panoramic xray is about as much radiation as you'd get from about 10 days of background radiation (i.e., the radiation you are exposed to simply by living).

Just doing a cursory Google search found that a modern panoramic averages 8 to 10 microSV. For comparison, a normal chest x-ray is 30 microSV. CT Scans can get into the hundreds.

So, I think you should always ensure that the x-rays are medically necessary, but generally speaking these are safe.

-Chicago29
Image

Image

Image

Image

Noam
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:51 pm

#3 Post by Noam »

Thanks chicago29.

I did some search too and found the following:
Effective doses are:

• intraoral dental X ray imaging procedure 1–8 μSv;
• panoramic examinations 4-30 μSv;
• cephalometric examinations 2-3 μSv,
• CBCT procedures 34-652 μSv,(for small dento-alveolar volumes) and 30-1079 μSv, (for large “cranio-facial” volumes).

Thus the doses from intraoral and cephalometric dental radiological procedures are lower, usually less than one day of natural background radiation. Doses for panoramic procedures are more variable, but even at the high end of the range are equivalent to a few days of natural background radiation which is similar to that of a chest radiograph
Taken from:
http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/ ... n-dose.htm

monarch
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:48 pm

#4 Post by monarch »

I know that the surgeons etc. will not perform the surgery without the x-rays. So, IMHO, it is worth the slight risk to have the necessary work done. I have heard that you can offer yourself some slight protection against the radiation by taking Vitamin C, but I don't know if that is a myth or if there is some truth in it. Nevertheless, I give it to my family whenever we must undergo any x-rays.

chipmunkcheeks
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:59 pm
Location: Long Island, NY

x rays

#5 Post by chipmunkcheeks »

I dont think that you should worry only because between 2 surgeries, braces for 2+ years, etc. I have had at least 15 xrays of my face...seriously, and that is probably the lowest I would guess. It could be more...that being said...I probably going to glow before you. Though, I think it was worth it.

Kirish
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:25 am

#6 Post by Kirish »

A paper was published a week ago claiming the risk of thyroid cancer can go up by 5 fold after 5-9 dental x-rays:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... -risk.html
Noam.

descantus
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:36 am
Location: London, UK

#7 Post by descantus »

Whilst Kirish is right to remind us all that it's always good idea to always ask if your xrays are absolutely necessary, I wouldn't worry about these types of reports that are usually taken out of context and rarely based on bona fide peer reviewed journals, without any critical analysis at all.

Also, the link is to the DAILY MAIL! A paper famous for its obsessive weekly reports of things that give you cancer (it's previousy published 'scientific' evidence that you can get cancer from chewing gum, pringles, facebook, having children, not having children, bras, working, and most famously, bread!)

So if anyone's worried about Xrays, here's a list that proves they're the least of your worries :wink:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=269512464297
Follow my story:
http://dentalpurgatory.blogspot.com/

Image
[/url]

User avatar
bb
Posts: 383
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:39 am

#8 Post by bb »

descantus wrote:'scientific' evidence that you can get cancer from chewing gum, pringles, facebook, having children, not having children, bras, working, and most famously, bread!
I'm doomed! Pass the pringles please! :lol:
Image

MetalMedic
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:23 pm

#9 Post by MetalMedic »

You get exposed to more background radiation throughout your lifetime than you ever will by being exposed to x-rays in a lifetime from diagnostic procedures. You'll be fine. Unless you work in a nuclear power plant or work in a radiology department in a hospital, you're fine. Don't worry about it.
Image

Image

Le fort 1 impaction 6mm, BSSO 6mm advance, Genioplasty

Post Reply