Waterpik (or similar) vs. flossing

[wcllana]

Waterpiks can't replace floss because of the nature of plaque

Read the quote carefully:

[quote]Water jets are wonderful at reducing periodontal pathogens in pockets up to six millimeters and reducing bleeding and inflammation. For perio purposes, the motion of the water pulsing across the opening of the sulcus/pocket creates a suction that virtually sucks out the free-floating bacteria from under the gingival crest. This action dramatically decreases the number of pathogens in the pocket. Instructions -The tip of the water jet should be pointing directly between the teeth from the outside to the inside, apical to the contact - not directly at the pocket - for flushing.[[/quote]

It doesn't refer to removing plaque, but to reducing bacteria in gingival pockets, which I'm sure it does. But plaque is a different matter.

Bacteria creates a thin film that sticks to surfaces like glue and needs significant mechanical action to remove. While a Waterpik could remove plaque if the jet where powerful enough it would cause so much gum damage there would be no point.

I think the Waterpik is a great addition to the cleaning routine and the only part I ever found fun - see my next post.

[jz2888]

Where in Australia can I purchase Waterpik and what's the price?

Thanks

[ultra]

My dentist recommended using a waterpik and regular floss - I agree with him. Using a Waterpik is great for ortho patients who need the extra cleaning, but regular floss is always going to get right up into the gum line between the teeth. So for very thorough cleaning I say use both.

I also live in NZ where the Waterpik flosser is more expensive, but so is everything else!